Skip to main content

Android with Kotlin, iOS with Swift, Kotlin Native, flutter.io, React Native, PWA, Xamarin, Hybrid - which way to go?

Currently there are tons of frameworks how to get your business model to the user... and in the app store
  • Full Native
    • Android with Kotlin, iOS with Swift
    • Deepest integration
    • Single way to make sure that you have no lock-in effect with a framework, and you are f**ed, when Apple or Google disallows the usage of a specific technology...
    • Two teams required
    • 2x code
  • PWA (Progressive Web App)
    • Write offline- and push-capable PWA with web-technologies only
    • Some native features might require hybrid native development and bridging (like In-App purchases, AR, ...)
    • In best case:
      • One web team only for website and app
      • Maybe some native specialists for special features
  • Kotlin Native
    • Develop a shared framework with or without UI using Kotlin Native
    • Additional native code will most probably be required
    • Big Android team, small iOS specialists
  • flutter.io (React Native | Xamarin | ... )
    • One codebase (flutter: Dart, React Native: JavaScript, Xamarin: C#)
      • Additional native code will most probably be required
    • flutter.io is supposed to be the next default development platform for upcoming Android-successor Fuchsia - and has a good hype at the moment 
    • Big flutter team with some iOS and Android specialists
      • Or enthusiastic native developers that want to jump on flutter
  • Hybrid
    • Mix of PWA, Web and Full Native where you choose e.g. on a screen or feature-wise level what to use with which technology
    • Mix of Web, Android and iOS specialists
How to make a decision from here?
There is no simple answer to this - the longer you are working with the technologies and teams, the more the context gets into focus rather than the technology itself. You should ask yourself: What is the most suitable technology for my context?
  • What are the planned features and which technologies are mandatory?
  • How can I standout from my competitors?
  • Which skills are in my team?
  • What budget do I have at hands?
  • How fast do I need to move - how much risk can I take (lock-in effect, dropped technology, development speed, quality, ...)?
  • How long-term do I have to plan?
  • Which crew/teams do I have at hands with which skills... and which commitment?
    • Freelance/internal?
    • Technical skills?
  • Do I have an app-only use-case or do I have to maintain a website as well?
After having answered those questions for yourself, head back to the stacks presented above - and choose your weapon.

What do we do at WELT?
Well, we have a full native team staffed already and our native apps have excellent ratings.

For Edition (iOS and Android) we have chosen to go for the (local) hybrid way - so the main application is native code but most of the views are WebViews, showing local HTML for performance and synergy reasons.

For News (iOS and Android) we went fully native, following the Server-driven UI principle:
  • We defined a design language with pre-defined, multi-purpose bricks, having the backend defining the screens and data
  • We shift as much as possible of the business logic to the backend, to avoid double implementation and staying flexible for changes without requiring to do another app release in the App Stores
  • We have a slighty bigger Android/Kotlin crew that takes care not only of the Android client, but also of the backend implementation using Kotlin with Spring Boot
    • We share a Kotlin lib with the Android Client and the backend
    • We are also trying to share the lib with iOS using Kotlin/Native but are not there yet
For us this works out quite nicely and we can move fast, adding more and more flexibility by shifting more and more dynamic logic to the backend.

For you it most probably is a question of your context
😊

Thanks to Anton Averin and Pawl Polanski for your input!

More reads:
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Favorite Posts

Server-driven UI (SDUI): Meet Zalandos AppCraft and AirBnB Lona

A short WTF: Joe Birch:  SERVER DRIVEN UI, PART 1: THE CONCEPT Zalando seems to follow the SDUI principle as well - defining a common design language and construct the screens on the backend while displaying them natively on the clients. They even go one step further; they implemented a mighty toolset to enable non-technical stakeholders to define their own native app screens Compass: Web tooling to create screens and bind data Beetroot: Backend service that combines the screen layout definition with the data Lapis/Golem: iOS/Android UI render engines Crazy cool! Good job, guys (when you do an open-source release?) To even move faster a Flutter based UI render engine implementation was great! See also AirBnB Lona SDUI approach Building a Visual Language Why Dropbox sunsetted its universal C++ mobile project and AirBnB its React Native implementation
2 comments
Read more

Xamarin and MvvmCross

Xamarin Create Native iOS, Android, Mac and Windows apps in C# Xamarin delivers high performance compiled code with full access to all the native APIs so you can create native apps with device-specific experiences. Anything you can do in Objective-C or Java, you can do in C# with Xamarin. Xamarin MvvmCross for Xamarin This project provides a cross-platform mvvm mobile development framework built on top of: Silverlight for WP7, WP8 Mono for Android (or Xamarin.Android) MonoTouch for iOS (or Xamarin.iOS) the WinRT XAML framework for Windows 8 Store apps. WPF Mono for Mac (or Xamarin.Mac) This project makes extensive use of Portable Class Libraries to provide maintainable cross platform C# native applications. GitHub
Post a Comment
Read more

Judo App - Server Driven UI out of the box

Judo App Judo brings server-driven UI to your iOS and Android apps. Build user interfaces visually in a fraction of time and publish them instantly without submitting to the app store. Build Experiences - With No Code The Judo app for macOS, available through the App Store, is built for design professionals with common keyboard shortcuts and familiar concepts like canvas, layers and inspector panel. Workflow is streamlined with the ability to drag and drop media files directly into your experiences and manage your own Judo files in Finder. Manage Creative Execution A Judo experience is interactive and can include text, images, video and buttons. An experience may be part of a screen, a single screen, or more typically multiple linked screens. Judo supports screen transitions, carousels, horizontal scrolling and modals. Clients can add custom fonts and define global colors and these are updates applied universally. Effortlessly Deploy Judo Cloud syncs your experiences with your iOS and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

iPad HTTP Debugging with Charles

After noticing that the caching in iPad Safari seemed a little funky, I made an effort to decipher some of the logic used by the browser cache. I didn’t get very far, but in the process I figured out how to route my iPad HTTP traffic through a web debugger on my laptop. It turns out it was very easy to do (although I’m sure there is a more complicated way to go about it). What follows is a simple step-by-step for connecting your iPad to an HTTP debugging proxy. The main requirement is that your desktop/laptop and iPad be on the same wireless network. Then it’s just a matter of telling your iPad to use your desktop as an HTTP proxy. iPad HTTP Debugging with Charles
Post a Comment
Read more
LazyPages is a highly customizable library that helps you to show a scrollable list of view controllers synchronized with an index. It is written in Swift 2.2 for iOS 8+. Like Scrollable Tabs in Android. GitHub
Post a Comment
Read more